2020. 3. 25. 20:36ㆍ카테고리 없음
This is why Apple should have NEVER used Intel graphics in a laptop as expensive as the earlier MacBooks. Seriously, even the older PowerBook and iBook G4s in 2005 had better gaming performance despite the much slower CPUs, all because they had decent dedicated graphics (usually Mobility Radeon 9x00-class by then). It's a moot point nowadays with the use of the GeForce 9400M, but that came several years after the first MacBooks. In any case, Source-engine games like Half-Life 2 should run okay on DirectX 7 or 8 (no shaders and reduced shaders, respectively). Games older than that probably won't give you too much hassle, but anything newer is probably out of the question unless you don't mind slideshow framerates. And, of course, there's the odd indie game like Cortex Command that burdens the CPU very heavily, but barely uses the GPU at all.
Your MacBook and its Core 2 Duo won't have much problem with those, though they're more the exception than the rule. My experience with mac's of late has been limited.
Windows has its share of problems, but so does a mac. People love mac like people love anything that is remotely cool. Mac's are sleek and sexy and fast enough that most users can't even tell, nor do they care, that they got older or slower components for more.
They are paying for the looks, the feel, and the name. The mac OSX does nothing ground breaking, but does appeal to business owners and employees because of its simplistic desktop (dashboard??) and speed. Mac also makes it easy, you buy a macbook, or a macbook pro and pick a screen size (yes I know you can pick a speed.
But selection is limited) No need to worry about anything else. Its smart becasue it is simple, and that is how they are designed to be, easy accessiable to everyone. My biggest gripe against Apple is not its products, but it's users. I will leave it at that. QUOTE='AMDAtiFanboy'GMAX3100 is not for gaming men,it's only for office application,browse the net,and any other particular office works.if you up for game,then i suggest you switch to a better notebooks,such one who had dedicated display cards like nVidia's 9000M series or Ati's HD3000 series:) NotAFurry Hey, I played HL1 and Sin on a crappy 1MB graphics card. Kk but your limited to older games and while it may be able to play some lees demanding newer games your gameing experience will be compromised with low graphics and framerates and even older games will look better once you force AA and AF.
QUOTE='Munkyman587'not exactly useless, but people who never use it seem to think so. For gaming or compatibility. Windows is great. On my mac, I never lost a single document for classes, the thing did not crash a single time.
Before someone says, 'then you fail at PC' or something similar, I am an A+ certified PC tech. I know how to use a windows PC. Mac is just great as a stable platform and solid hardware that doesn't need to be maintained much. JigglyWiggly How do you lose files on a pc?
BTW A+ certificate means absolutely nothing. Don't try to use those as you know anything. I run server 2k8r2 on my server and it runs brilliantly, even with 5 VMs for my server running ubuntu and fedora, it runs flawlessly. I haven't lost any files why? Because I have a backup of a backup. I use microsoft's robocopy to create a script and make my pc powerup my other backup and copy files over too it at 3am. It works brilliantally.
I haven't had any problems with Windows or Linux/Unix. Macs on the otherhand don't do anything better than those two, and just create compatability issues, they have the same compatability as Unix/Linux and they wan't to be a considered a real desktop os. Guess I hit a nerve =D my response? I run a 680i motherboard that has not run at advertised stability.
Why not switch it? I am a fairly broke college student that uses a PC mostly for gaming. My mac has held up well, I don't bother reformatting every 6 months because it doesn't collect as much baggage, and I lose documents on a pc when the drivers decide to throw a fit and toss me the rare BSoD that EVGA refuses to fix, even with countless hours on the phone and multiple reformats. Grats on running VMs, I fail to see where that means anything to this conversation, but I guess you are proud of the amount of ram you have? I am just happy that I don't have to back-up my back-ups in the first place because I have never had an issue on my mbp. I know it is silly not to have back-ups beyond my flash drive, but w/e. Never knew using a mac was so upsetting to some people.
Yea, Sorry for the Bump 'n all, but I could not leave the X3100 without justice. Sure it is not the greatest graphics card ever, not even close lol, but I mean, it can most definetely run most games, even if it sounds crazy, it's true, I have even made a new youtube channel dedicated to me testing games on the X3100. I will list it, but I'm not trying to advertise, I'm just proving a point.
Now, the X3100 can run lot's of games and the most shocking result i have ever seen is the Crysis one. Some person on youtube is a very good tweaker. So he tweaks games to run on the X3100, here are the Crysis links: Crysis: Crysis Warhead: Now, even though the graphics are on low, and maybe the game doesn't run at 60 FPS, it is VERY playable, and I would not even argue with that. Stalker Call of Pripyat, is a brand new game, yet it runs well on the X3100: Now, all of you with a great graphics card, before you start saying that new games don't run at high Framerates, understand this: The X3100 is NOT a gaming card, but it can most certainly run most of the games at acceptable rates, as you can see, even Crysis runs good on the X3100, and that is saying something.
Check my blog for more X3100 info. Yea, Sorry for the Bump 'n all, but I could not leave the X3100 without justice. Sure it is not the greatest graphics card ever, not even close lol, but I mean, it can most definetely run most games, even if it sounds crazy, it's true, I have even made a new youtube channel dedicated to me testing games on the X3100. I will list it, but I'm not trying to advertise, I'm just proving a point.
Now, the X3100 can run lot's of games and the most shocking result i have ever seen is the Crysis one. Some person on youtube is a very good tweaker. So he tweaks games to run on the X3100, here are the Crysis links: Crysis: Crysis Warhead: Now, even though the graphics are on low, and maybe the game doesn't run at 60 FPS, it is VERY playable, and I would not even argue with that. Stalker Call of Pripyat, is a brand new game, yet it runs well on the X3100: Now, all of you with a great graphics card, before you start saying that new games don't run at high Framerates, understand this: The X3100 is NOT a gaming card, but it can most certainly run most of the games at acceptable rates, as you can see, even Crysis runs good on the X3100, and that is saying something. Check my blog for more X3100 info.
ResistanceKid The X3100 is not a graphic card. Its an integrated graphic chip integrated on a mobo. Acceptable depends on the point of view. If you have always gamed with IGP's then it will be playable, but if you always play on higher end hardware, playing with something as a X3100 would be a bad experience.
Not exactly useless, but people who never use it seem to think so. For gaming or compatibility. Windows is great. On my mac, I never lost a single document for classes, the thing did not crash a single time. Before someone says, 'then you fail at PC' or something similar, I am an A+ certified PC tech. I know how to use a windows PC. Mac is just great as a stable platform and solid hardware that doesn't need to be maintained much.
Munkyman587 i used to video edit and multi task on some high end apple pro's (the last gen the have PPC's and the first gen to have TIGER) and yet despite all the hype of all a 'more stable OS', i woudl quite often see the spinning colour wheel of doom! I see no reason to really want a mac ( isell them along side regular PC's at work) and apart from their inherint sexiness, they don't do much different except NOT give me access to decent video cards.(27' i7 mac desktop, 4gb ddr3 ram 1tb hdd, and they go and stick a maximum ATI HD 4850.all for $2889 AU). I appreciate them for what they are, a simple and easy OS for use by those not bogged down with years of (plesant) windows experience, but that price tag be damned. Its much cheaper to buy ur own i7 and a p6t asus mobo and using some easy instructions install OSX on there instead. But still.why? Macs are junk.
Windows is mostly junk. Linux is gold. Im getting my A+ cert. Even i know it means nothing all you have to do is read a book.
Its sad that we have so many fake techs running around. I would say play older games like Half life 1 and other Goldsource engine games. Source engine games wont run so well and FPS will probably jitter alot. I would just sell the POS and get a windows pc. Or install linux on the mac to improve performance since linux runs incredibly well on nearly anything.
Intel Graphic X3100 Drivers For Mac Mac
Then try some of the games on linux with emulation software. Macs are junk. Windows is mostly junk. Linux is gold. Im getting my A+ cert. Even i know it means nothing all you have to do is read a book. Its sad that we have so many fake techs running around.
I would say play older games like Half life 1 and other Goldsource engine games. Source engine games wont run so well and FPS will probably jitter alot. I would just sell the POS and get a windows pc. Or install linux on the mac to improve performance since linux runs incredibly well on nearly anything. Then try some of the games on linux with emulation software.
KLONE360 Which is odd, because Macs are extremely similar to Linux. One is UNIX, the other is unix-like. And Macs are now using that nextstep stuff, so they have FreeBSD in them, hell Mac people contribute to FreeBSD. I am not saying Macs are good, but saying Linux is awesome and Macs suck is a bit hypocritical. I mean look at the directory structure, and go into the terminal, I am sure you won't notice anything different, unless you are an avid user of either one. Now if you think I like Macs the desktops like their systems. No not even a little bit.
Their OS is nice though.